Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saint Nik said:This thread isn't meant as a shot at the team for dealing him, just that I was always in his corner and am interested to see what he makes of his career.
Coincidentally, I decided to start this thread after seeing he got a hat-trick tonight.
Versteeg Verever!
Champ Kind said:Saint Nik said:This thread isn't meant as a shot at the team for dealing him, just that I was always in his corner and am interested to see what he makes of his career.
Coincidentally, I decided to start this thread after seeing he got a hat-trick tonight.
Versteeg Verever!
He's sure making the most of his opportunity in Florida, where he's getting first line minutes and - coincidentally? - playing like a first line player.
Bender said:Champ Kind said:Saint Nik said:This thread isn't meant as a shot at the team for dealing him, just that I was always in his corner and am interested to see what he makes of his career.
Coincidentally, I decided to start this thread after seeing he got a hat-trick tonight.
Versteeg Verever!
He's sure making the most of his opportunity in Florida, where he's getting first line minutes and - coincidentally? - playing like a first line player.
Well TBH looking at the goals I feel like he's getting into the dirty areas and banking home the goals. I think maybe he's simply a better fit in Florida.
Seymore Pucks said:I actually thought he was going ok on the third line with Armstrong before he got traded.
Saint Nik said:Seymore Pucks said:I actually thought he was going ok on the third line with Armstrong before he got traded.
I don't think the issue with him was ever his play. He was always a talented player who got good results. As mentioned there was kind of an issue with his fit here as there was a lot of similarity between him and Kessel that made him kind of a bad fit for the top line and, with the 2nd line as successful as it was, the only spot for him was on the 3rd while getting a lot of special teams play.
I don't think it'll go down as a terrible trade because the Leafs got a fairly decent return for him but I do think it was a situation where the Leafs kind of bailed on a really talented player a little too soon.
crazyperfectdevil said:Perhaps...but philly didn't exactly seem thrilled with him either
crazyperfectdevil said:Perhaps...but philly didn't exactly seem thrilled with him either
Busta Reims said:crazyperfectdevil said:Perhaps...but philly didn't exactly seem thrilled with him either
I'm not so sure you can really tell Philly's impression of him when he was moved in what was a mainly cap related deal.
Corn Flake said:*cough* contract year *cough*
Tigger said:If you can say it was a cap related deal with complete certainty I think you can say something was up with their impression of him overall with what they got for him to make that decision, young talented skaters don't normally get turned over so quickly for less than the purchase price.
Tigger said:If you can say it was a cap related deal with complete certainty I think you can say something was up with their impression of him overall with what they got for him to make that decision, young talented skaters don't normally get turned over so quickly for less than the purchase price.
L K said:Corn Flake said:*cough* contract year *cough*
that's a little unfair to just automatically label every single player who has a god year in a contract year as it being related to that. He's 25 and in his 4th NHL season (all three previous years with 20+ goals and 53, 44, 46 points) getting an opportunity to play on the top line for a team.
Busta Reims said:Tigger said:If you can say it was a cap related deal with complete certainty I think you can say something was up with their impression of him overall with what they got for him to make that decision, young talented skaters don't normally get turned over so quickly for less than the purchase price.
Well, it's not like they traded him for a ton less than they gave up for him. He was acquired for a 1st & a 3rd and traded for a 2nd & a 3rd in what is supposed to be a deeper draft. Considering there was less time on his contract when the 2nd deal was made, they probably received roughly equal value to what they surrendered.
Tigger said:Picks aside that still doesn't explain why they decided to take a risk on a roster spot and similar cap hit with Jagr and turn over a young talent so quickly that could likely net more in a deadline deal this year if that was the plan.
I haven't read a satisfactory explanation from Holmgren so it's pretty speculative no matter but accepting less in this situation seems weird to me.