herman
Well-known member
I would not have signed Raddysh because I'd prefer a rebuild.
There are no Leafs first rounders in Toronto’s control so there is little to no point rebuilding in the next two seasons minimum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would not have signed Raddysh because I'd prefer a rebuild.
Pelley sitting in on trade deadline day is all you need to know. They didn't trust Tre to do the right thing so they babysat him.
There are no Leafs first rounders in Toronto’s control so there is little to no point rebuilding in the next two seasons minimum.
There's near zero ability or reason to rebuild at this juncture without your own first round picks. Raddysh is free acquisition which can let you make moves elsewhere and as far as I know he doesn't have complete trade protection so if we need to pivot there's another asset you can sell off if we need to. The cap is becoming less and less relevant and you need talent (which we don't have currently) to sell to accrue futures.I think they clipped Treliving's abilities well before they fired him.
All the machinations to get Marner's cap money for a year plus ... and no one really decent to spend it on with the barren UFA market - which was foreseen on this site and elsewhere. And then the team goes in the toilet. Pelley sat in on the trade deadline. I think Treliving's strings were cut after Shanahan departed but well before he was fired.
I would not have traded Woll like Chayka did - still not crazy about that deal. And I would not have signed Raddysh because I'd prefer a rebuild.
There has never been a presentation that Chayka studied rebuild vs retool and presented his conclusions to MLSE board. They just seemed to go straight into retool because Pelley said as much prior to hiring a GM. So the board is calling the shots on the overall direction. They control the purse strings as they always have.
From that, if I am in Chayka's boots, then I have to sign Raddysh. "My boss wants us to retool ..." On that basis, his decision to do that is defensible (even if the long term is ugly - that will be part of the price of the rebuild later). For that size & term of a deal, Chayka had to get board approval - like all NHL GMs. So MLSE board - the owners - are right behind Chayka on this. Chayka, like any other NHL GM, is an employee of MLSE and he has to do their bidding.
That is no different than when Pat Quinn was GM. Or JFJ. Or Brian Burke. Or Shanahan/Dubas, etc, etc.
When Treliving's team was sinking, MLSE protected their talent assets, as they should, from a GM desperately floundering to survive.
So, in my opinion, that is how it is.
And they got swept in the first round by Columbus one year.One down season and "REBULD!" ...seems like an overreaction. All factors considered, worth giving it half of next season to season how the team looks under a new coach and reinforcements. Can still sell at next years deadline if this team is still a lost cause.
The core of Lightning players that went on to win multiple cups had a season where they missed the playoffs. I think it's possible for this Leafs team to at least be in the mix in the Eastern Conference next season.
One down season and "REBULD!" ...seems like an overreaction. All factors considered, worth giving it half of next season to season how the team looks under a new coach and reinforcements. Can still sell at next years deadline if this team is still a lost cause.
The core of Lightning players that went on to win multiple cups had a season where they missed the playoffs. I think it's possible for this Leafs team to at least be in the mix in the Eastern Conference next season.