Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Asked if the Leafs would possibly trade away the top pick, Lamoriello chuckled, adding, ?I don?t think you?ll see that.?
Al14 said:Probably being pushed by Bettman and Co.
I start to listen when I hear they're offering #7, #20, OLE, Strome, and, Domi. Anything less and I hang up the phone!
The players picked at #7 and #20 may not amount to anything, so, we have to get OLE, Strome, and Domi minimum, JMHO.
TBLeafer said:Al14 said:Probably being pushed by Bettman and Co.
I start to listen when I hear they're offering #7, #20, OLE, Strome, and, Domi. Anything less and I hang up the phone!
The players picked at #7 and #20 may not amount to anything, so, we have to get OLE, Strome, and Domi minimum, JMHO.
OLE
Habs fan? (yes I'm that guy.)
CarltonTheBear said:This thread should be titled "Freelance sports writer nobody ever heard of needs RTs".
Nik the Trik said:I doubt it gets much crazier. With Arizona already essentially saying they're not going to include OEL and the famously tight-lipped Lamoriello basically ruling out the idea of trading the pick as per that NYT quote then really the only thing we're likely to see between here and now are things like this, people who aren't all that reliable reporting unrealistic scenarios.
TBLeafer said:Its just gonna get crazier after the SCF so we might as well have a thread anyway.
bustaheims said:TBLeafer said:Its just gonna get crazier after the SCF so we might as well have a thread anyway.
To discuss all the stuff we already know is garbage?
TBLeafer said:Nik the Trik said:I doubt it gets much crazier. With Arizona already essentially saying they're not going to include OEL and the famously tight-lipped Lamoriello basically ruling out the idea of trading the pick as per that NYT quote then really the only thing we're likely to see between here and now are things like this, people who aren't all that reliable reporting unrealistic scenarios.
We discount anything from Eklund here too, right?
Perfect.Tigger said:TBLeafer said:Nik the Trik said:I doubt it gets much crazier. With Arizona already essentially saying they're not going to include OEL and the famously tight-lipped Lamoriello basically ruling out the idea of trading the pick as per that NYT quote then really the only thing we're likely to see between here and now are things like this, people who aren't all that reliable reporting unrealistic scenarios.
We discount anything from Eklund here too, right?
Who's Eklund?
I think he means Peklund.Tigger said:TBLeafer said:Nik the Trik said:I doubt it gets much crazier. With Arizona already essentially saying they're not going to include OEL and the famously tight-lipped Lamoriello basically ruling out the idea of trading the pick as per that NYT quote then really the only thing we're likely to see between here and now are things like this, people who aren't all that reliable reporting unrealistic scenarios.
We discount anything from Eklund here too, right?
Who's Eklund?